The first time I heard this was like a revelation. Who was this band? Even though it’s the same producer, this album sounds so much more “rock” than Morning Glory. I thought I might have finally figured out what everyone else has. Read More
1992, Alternartive, Alternative Rock, Dream Pop, Music, Neo Psychedelia, and Shoegaze.
I thought I was getting shoegaze, and I do.. But there’s a lot of other stuff going on here that isn’t strict shoegaze. One of the things that I don’t love about some shoegaze is the relentless commitment to one particular style. But there’s enough variety here that I’m kept interested. Also, the songs are pretty good so it’s not just the wall of sound that is appealing. 7/10 Read More
1996, Art Rock, Indie Pop, Music, Neo Psychedelia, Psychedelia, and Psychedelic Pop.
This is a rather ridiculous record that asks us to indulge this band’s impulses immediately. This is a debut album and yet it’s a double LP length and it’s full of 10 tracks with the same name and numerous experiment that could have been cut. When these guys want to write songs, they’re pretty good at it. But there’s just so much damn material here and lots of it isn’t up to the standards of the opening tracks. And this thing is just so damn worshipful of both 60s psychedelia and early 70s McCartney. If you like that stuff, well Read More
Mercury Rev combine recent goings on in Shoegaze with psychedelia (to a greater extent than the British Shoegaze bands that inclined that way) and a knack for poppy hooks. The result is a bizarre, perhaps too ambitious, crazy record that is better than anything the Lips had managed up till that point. (Why compare them? Sorry…) To me this stuff is more interesting than the straight Shoegaze; it connects with me more for whatever reason. It does feel like there are more ideas, for one thing. Even if that last track is way too long, this is great stuff. 8/10 Read More
This is among the most “rock” of all ’90s Brit Pop albums I’ve heard. The band not only appears to really like guitars a lot, but likes lots of rock music, not just the rock music made by British bands between 1962 and 1966. It’s certainly the most rootsy, or the most “classic rock” of the Brit Pop albums I’ve heard. Maybe that makes it more derivative (particularly of the Stones) than some of the more inventive Brit Bop bands (like Blur) or some of the ones more influenced by Post Punk (like Pulp), but I’d still much rather listen Read More
1996, Indie Folk, Indie Rock, Lo-Fi Indie, Music, Neo Psychedelia, Psychedelic Folk, and Singer Songwriter.
This feels like the inevitable result of trying to make folk music in the age of indie rock and, specifically, in the age of Pavement (and their related bands). So much of what they do here has become canonical or cliche (depending on your point of view) for the numerous indie folk bands that have followed in their footsteps. The songs are pretty conventional (with a few notable exceptions) but the arrangements are anything but – elaborate, dense arrangements featuring guitars, keyboards and percussion that would not normally have been applied to folk songs, or indie rock songs for that Read More
I understand why people like this stuff and I understand why it’s trailblazing. (Though I’m not exactly sure why some people consider this shoegaze, though that is a different story…) But I have two problems with this record that keep me from giving it the respect a lot of people think it deserves. The first problem is that for something considered “neo-psychedelia” it’s pretty samey throughout. There’s not a lot of variation even between the two band member’s sounds. I mean, there’s some, but it’s relative and very much “on style.” (On a related note: I find it lacking a Read More
1990, Alternative, Alternative Rock, Funk Rock, Hard Rock, Music, and Neo Psychedelia.
I don’t know what I was expecting when I finally got around to listening to this record, but it wasn’t this. That is sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing. But expectations always mess with our appreciation. Hopefully I can get through mine. First of all, I finally understand why Navarro is a guitar hero to a certain generation. I had never understood why before, but had rarely heard him play. Aside from Slash (who is, by the way, much better), I can’t think of another guitar player to embrace classic rock guitar like Navarro does here. That’s pretty Read More
I avoided the Lips’ cover of The Dark Side of the Moon like the plague, figuring that was an album that absolutely did not have to be covered and also because I’ve been finding the Lips’ willful weirdness to be increasingly maddening and hard to follow. (I have no idea if I’m going to like anything by them any more – not since a long time ago – they release things in so many different ways, it’s exhausting etc.). But then I was sitting in the Only a while ago and something was playing in the background. I had to Read More
Cleaner and rockier (because of the collaboration, we’re told) than the last album, and it’s less interesting as a result. The appeal of these bands (for me) is in the idiosyncratic arrangements and production, not in the songs (which are never as strong as we’re told) or in the vocal harmonies (never been my thing). And when you strip this kind of stuff of its warts – even if those warts are [i]extremely[/i] affected – you are left with run of the mill indie pop or, in this case, indie pop that is just energetic enough to be better than Read More
On my initial listen I felt like these were some kind of less artsy fartsy Wolf Parade, not that this is accurate at all (or that I even know Wolf Parade). But on further listens what I hear is something very symptomatic of the late aughts: a band with a good sense of melody (not necessarily good songs, that’s not the same) who have elevated arrangements and production to the status of Gospel. That kind of thing sometimes bugs me, especially with music that is overtly hooky. (I prefer finer things: grit, dynamics, aggression, good songs, the destruction of or Read More
2012, Alternative Dance, Electronica, Indie Electronic, Music, Neo Psychedelia, and Noise Pop.
I want to make some kind of Supernatural joke but I can’t come up with one. I am all for pushing your creative boundaries, I think it is great that the Lips are being absolutely ridiculous with all these odd EPs and special releases. I won’t listen to most of it, but good for them for being ridiculous. I don’t see this compilation of collaborations to be consistent because of the collaborators; it’s actually quite consistent, amazingly enough. My problem lies elsewhere. This may sound weird, and it’s probably idiotic, but to me some of the tracks – the “rockers” Read More
I have avoided everything the Lips have done in studio since Embryonic – I saw them live last summer – for two reasons: 1) because I am adverse to weird formats and must admit that I am just a CD kind of guy and 2) because Coyne kept promising “guitars” for album after album and instead we were left with more of the same noisy-but-catchy-and-clean pop shtick they had performing for the whole of the ’00s. But I caught this on NPR’s First Listen and I was suddenly intrigued again. This album is not the album I wanted but more Read More
This is very strong early ’80s British post-punk. They sound a lot like some their contemporaries – albeit rawer – which isn’t really a good thing, but the thing that, to my ears, distinguishes them from the pack is that they have way better lyrics on the whole. I don’t have to worry about listening to these lyrics, which is nice and a relatively rare thing for a young band. The strong lyrics helps elevate the music, which is often more creative – or at least more forward and backward looking – than their contemporaries. To explain the forward / Read More
This was sold to me as some kind of “investigation” of American folk music. It’s hard to really see it as such. There are certain elements of it that are influenced by American folk music, but it’s hardly a dominant thing. (It also depends what you mean by “American folk music.”) But the label is kind of irrelevant. There is a lot going on here and it is interesting whatever its pretensions. The songs could be stronger, but everything else is pretty great. 8/10 Read More
Years and years ago, I added this to my list. I don’t remember why. I must have read all the positive reviews. I don’t know. Years later, I watched an interesting documentary about BJM and the Dandy Warhols where I learned two things: I didn’t like the Dandy Warhols and I had absolutely no interest in learning anything more about BJM. But I must have forgotten that entirely when I bought this a little while ago. I only remembered it once I started listening. I figure you can be revivalist in two, not necessarily mutually exclusive ways: you can celebrate Read More
A brief word before this: I am a music fan first and foremost and everything else is secondary. So I don’t put much stock in performance (beyond whether its musically good or not) and so don’t get the wrong idea. We arrived around 8:20 or so last night to see the end of Portugal, the Man’s set. They were a little better live than I remembered them but that’s because they were louder because they were live (and playing in a public square, necessitating more volume). Things didn’t get off to a good start. They looked ready to take the Read More
My step-dad buys the odd CD because of the looks of the girl. And I make fun of him (behind his back) for this. At least I think it’s the looks. Maybe it’s the voice as well, but looks are definitely a part of it. And usually I can’t understand it. But occasionally I come upon something where I sort of get how an alluring female voice can make you forget the musical problems. It’s why I went through a period where I tried to like She & Him. Her voice did it for me, though at this remove I Read More
Imagine Kaleidoscope, if they were ’80s college kids (and so liked the Velvets), had far more interest in ska, far less interest in learning to play foreign instruments, and with a sense of humour, and you maybe sort of get the idea of these guys. The instrumentals tackle a variety of styles but many of them have a vaguely ska-ish feel underlying them (sort of like ska world fusion or something). The songs with lyrics are pretty much all parodies of either contemporary music styles, scenes or subcultures but given enough of an ’80s college radio feel that the album Read More
In the CD players (this time around): 2 of the four discs of Zaireeka by the Flaming Lips. In case you don’t know, the album is 4 separate discs of the same “songs” and you are supposed to create your own listening experience using 2, 3 or 4 discs played at certain times. Right now I have disc 1 and 2 going slightly off, it’s pretty rid-damn-diculous. Incidentally, the theory is you will never once repeat a playing because each CD player is different. Who knows? It’s pretty crazy to hear one piano chord (obviously distorted by something) from one Read More