Music reviews for 1996 music albums, that I’ve listened to.
1. Tortoise: Millions Now Living Will Never Die (10/10)
2. Beck: Odelay (9/10)
In some ways we can see this as just a way, way more polished version of Mellow Gold, that is if we wanted to be reductionist. Not knowing the rest of his oeuvre at the time (he was constantly releasing other records), we might think he’s a one trick pony.
But this is a stronger set of songs than Mellow and the production is not only more “polished” but less frantic and insane. It’s still frantic, but it feels professional in a way that the first album did not.
That could be a bad thing, but Beck has honed his post-modern aesthetic here, so instead the polish is an asset. The record feels more mature, more of a coherent statement than just throwing stuff at the wall.
Sometimes I like this more than the first one, sometimes I don’t.
3. Neurosis: Through Silver in Blood (9/10)
I wrote the following in 2016:
Is this the first “post metal” album? I don’t know. I haven’t listened to the sub-genre enough to have any idea.
But I can see why some people think so: though there are lots of very obvious sludge and doom moments, there are are also decidedly non-traditional sounds that wouldn’t belong in more conventional metal.
The epic tracks are what you would think of when you think of sludge from this era, albeit stretched to ridiculous lengths. It’s the briefer interludes that throw the listener for a loop, wondering what is happening.
This isn’t really my thing – I prefer a little more variety to my metal, and better pacing; but I have to admit that I have a really hard time conceiving that this thing was released in 1996. It sure sounds like something that belongs in the 21st century, hence the high marks.
Having listened to a lot of ’90s metal in the interim I can say that this is absolutely a landmark and I was kind of harsh.
Additionally, it is hardly as one-note as I alleged.
4. Converge: Petitioning the Empty Sky (9/10)
I am pretty sure this is not the first metalcore album – not just because it’s not Converge’s first record… – but it sure sounds iconic to me. Hardcore punk mixes freely with thrash metal in a way that, for 1996, sounds incredibly modern and contemporary to, well, now. This record could be released 20 years later and people would like it.
I can’t speak to its influence – maybe there have been a bunch of crazy metalcore records prior to this one – but I can speak to its excellence: everything great about metalcore is here – the passion of hardcore, the thunder (for lack of a better word) and musicianship of metal, and so on.
Just great stuff.
5. The Make Up: Destination Love: Live! At Cold Rice (9/10)
When I first listened to this faux-live album I thought “Holy MC5 Batman.” At least initially, this band sounded like they were just MC5 worshipers, albeit in the best of ways.
But that’s a really superficial reading of this music and also a misunderstanding of both this band and the MC5, who may be inspired by some of the same things. On closer listening, this is much more than just the Garage Rock revival it appears to be.
It’s right for them to call their style gospel, as this is firmly influenced by the same gospel tradition that influenced the MC5 and ’60s garage rock bands; the music that gave these bands such crazy energy.
In fact, I think the Make Up do for gospel here what the Jayhawks, Uncle Tupelo and Whiskeytown have done for country, or what the Gun Club, Railroad Jerk and the White Stripes have done for the Blues: they have modernized it and revitalized it with the spirit of punk and influences from other genres you wouldn’t immediately connect with gospel (such as garage rock).
Just a great, great record.
6. Wilco: Being There (9/10)
This is the first Wilco album I ever heard and it made me a fan of the band, so I’m biased. But I’ll try not to be.
AM feels, to me, like Wilco were still trying to be something they weren’t – like some kind of Uncle Tupelo/Son Volt imitation, albeit with a very different songwriting approach.
This album feels much more like something original and unique compared to their debut. They’ve left alt country behind (though there’s still plenty of country) for a more full sound – a weird hybrid of indie rock and rock and roll that is only weird because nobody had done it before. Listening to this record, it feels obvious, like someone else should have done it.
I want to call this the Exile of Indie Rock, but it’s not that good, and maybe not diverse enough. It’s still a really strong set of songs that finds the perfect marriage between indie rock idiosyncrasy and the long tradition of rock and roll.
The only drawback is the repeated song. Otherwise, this is very close to their best record and one of the best records of 1996.
7. Sepultura: Roots (9/10)
I don’t know Sepultura. I’ve heard literally one song of theirs before on a compilation.
But listening to this, it’s hard for me to understand why people reject it, even if there are traces of Nu Metal. Without hearing Chaos AD – and so being pretty uninformed, I guess – this sounds like an absolutely crazy, almost entirely successful amalgam of styles that do not belong together. It’s really, really cool and it makes it all the more imperative for me to listen to the earlier album,
I think. I’ll get there, but in the meantime, this is pretty awesome.
8. Pearl Jam: No Code (9/10)
This Eddie Vedder dictatorship of a record is actually my third favourite Pearl Jam album. Though I am normally reluctant to see one band member take over (and usually dislike the results), somehow Vedder attempting to gain full creative control of a band he just sang in a few years earlier results in one of Pearl Jam’s best sets of songs of their career. What’s more, the artsy fartsy experimental excesses of Vitalogy (which I believe were also Vedder’s fault), are reigned in and, instead, incorporated into the songs for the most part. I think that’s a rather big improvement and, for a long time, this was one of my candidates for their best album.
I’ve since mellowed a little bit and there is a really annoying Vedder moment near the end that is hard to forgive. But, on balance, I still think this is a solid number 3 behind Vs. and Binaural.
9. Dirty Three: Horse Stories (9/10)
Dirty Three charts their own course in the post rock world, sounding nothing like other post rock bands, in part because of their unique configuration (violin, guitar, drums) and in part because of their willingness to be noisy.
The performances range from mournful to unbelievably intense while sounding like literally nobody else. Great stuff.
10. Neutral Milk Hotel: On Avery Island (8/10)
This feels like the inevitable result of trying to make folk music in the age of indie rock and, specifically, in the age of Pavement (and their related bands). So much of what they do here has become canonical or cliche (depending on your point of view) for the numerous indie folk bands that have followed in their footsteps.
The songs are pretty conventional (with a few notable exceptions) but the arrangements are anything but – elaborate, dense arrangements featuring guitars, keyboards and percussion that would not normally have been applied to folk songs, or indie rock songs for that matter (at the time, I mean). And then there’s the horns. And all of this is drowning in lo-fi production – on the guitars, particularly, and notably not on the vocals – that makes the arrangements sound denser than they actually are. It’s an approach that, as I said, is so commonplace now but in the mid ’90s was reserved to a few rock and post rock groups, not singer-songwriters.
A cool record.
11. Opeth: Morningrise (8/10)
I finally “get” Opeth. Read the review of Morningrise.
12. Tool: Aenima (8/10)
Coming at a band backwards is never the greatest idea. That’s unfortunately what I have done with Tool and so it’s difficult for me to fully put Aenima into its proper context. I can’t help but like the later albums better at this moment in time, if only because I have given them way more time to sink in.
That being said, this is certainly more diverse (at least in some respects) than what came later and it isn’t any softer for its diversity.
Though I have given it my requisite three listens I feel like this is something I will have to revisit to fully assess, perhaps in a year or so.
Update: I’ve forgotten to do this and I missed it on the podcast. Shit.
13. Tori Amos: Boys for Pele (8/10)
Amos’ “difficult” third album isn’t that difficult. Read the review of Boys for Pele.
14. Weezer: Pinkerton (8/10)
I wrote the following in 2012:
One of the myths of my generation is that this is some kind of lost treasure. Because it wasn’t played on the radio like the debut and it didn’t sell as many copies, it is somehow a forgotten classic. Of course that’s not true, because most Weezer fans (at least most Weezer fans I know) and plenty of other people will tell you how great this is. And given that at least two of these songs are regularly played on the radio, I have a really hard time buying that this is somehow a secret. It might have been a secret in, say, 1997, but now it has been established as some kind of classic.
Pinkerton is certainly better than the debut. The songs are more idiosyncratic (to their benefit) and, miracle of miracles, it is not horribly overproduced.
But I’m not sure those two things make this a transcendent record. It is certainly a good record, but it is still very much rooted in the concerns of Cuomo which, though they have clear appeal to many many people, don’t really ressonate with me like some other songwriter’s lyrics do.
So I’m inclined to say, ‘yes, this is a good album,’ but I can think of plenty of ’90s “difficult second albums” which are superior – and a few that are more difficult! – as well as many albums from ’96 which are better.
I think Pinkerton‘s stature is rather due to do things:
1. the fact that Weezer did not put out another album after it for years and
2. because it’s very clearly their best album.
But a band’s best album isn’t necessarily therefore a classic album.
I think I agree with that in 2016. If anything I like the songs a little less than I used to and it is still not really my thing. But I acknowledge that it’s as good as they got and I get why so many people love it.
15. Stereolab: Emperor Tomato Ketchup (8/10)
In 2005 or so, I wrote the following:
You can definitely hear the influence of this in a lot of more recent music. I would like it better if they didn’t sing in French (because I’m prejudiced) and if the vocals weren’t so damn cutesy.
Later, I wrote this:
Quite overrated. It’s fine. But it’s an acquired aesthetic and if you don’t love the aesthetic you are left wondering why people think this band is the greatest thing since sliced bread. It’s kind of hard to imagine what people were thinking when they gasm’d all over themselves praising it.
I think I have been a little harmed by the hype around this record. Yes, Stereolab pretty much invented a new form of indie rock, one that combined Krautrock with forms of pop music (such as tropicalia). And good on them. But this is the kind of thing I can respect more than like, because it’s so damn repetitive (yes, some Krautrock is too, but at least some of it rocks) and because of the twee female French vocals, which get on my nerves, rather than allure.
16. In Flames: The Jester Race (8/10)
Chronologically the last of the holy trinity of Gothenburg scene melodic death metal classics I maybe like the most. Read the review of The Jester Race.
17. Fred Eaglesmith: Drive-In Movie (8/10)
This is country music that has been made in awareness of actual rock music, rather than “country music” that has been made in the shadow of arena rock, which seemed to be what was getting all the radio play back in the mid-90s.
Eaglesmith is a strong songwriter whose influences sometimes show through a little too clearly. His arrangements are also good though, so it’s easy to ignore the obvious reference points.
A good album.
18. Sleater-Kinney: Call the Doctor (8/10)
This is my first encounter with Sleater-Kinney and, unfortunately, Riot Grrrl in general.
And the first impression is positive. It’s just punk but, unlike so much ’90s punk, it still sounds hard – such as the screams on the title track – rather than obnoxious and faux-British.
And this is a strong set of songs for music so consciously noisy. So that’s good too.
19. Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds: Murder Ballads (8/10)
Lyrically, this is the darkest, most morbid album the Bad Seeds ever recorded. And Cave walks a dangerous line, where he almost veers into self-parody. (He might well on some of the most graphic songs.) But it’s a unique record and, if you’re going to name your record Murder Ballads well, you should follow through on that.
Musically it’s mature compared to much of the early Bad Seeds – the bursts of noise that we’re used to are used more sparingly and to greater effect in terms of backing the lyrics. And it feels of the folk tradition, even if the music doesn’t really fit into that category.
We can probably think of this record as the very last of the early Bad Seeds records – the last record to be so obsessed with death, crime and punishment, and the last one to be as musically abrasive as the Seeds could be. And I guess it’s a pretty decent note for that version of the band to go out on.
20. Secret Chiefs 3: First Grand Constitution and By-Laws (8/10)
The sound of Mr. Bungle without Patton, which makes them even more schizophrenic and Zappa-indebted. (If the Zappa fetishist label was ever true of a band, it’s probably this one, at least at this early stage.)
The album’s opening track sounds like the introduction to an old horror movie, and I guess that’s sort of an accurate idea of what you’re in for (sort of).
This is stream of consciousness, whim-indulgent music. It’s quite creative, and it’s the first time, to my knowledge, anyone had really done this within rock music in about 35 years, but the lack of songs is a bit of a problem for me, now that I’m older. (When I first heard this in my early 20s, I thought it was incredible.)
This feels like the younger, more immature brother of Disco Volante. Is it possible that the greater participation of Bungle forced Spruance to indulge fewer of his whims? Probably.
But if you’re young, and you have never heard the Mothers (or Bungle), this will warp your fragile little mind and there will be no going back.
21. R.E.M.: New Adventures in Hi-Fi (8/10)
This was the first album I ever bought that I knew about before it came out. So it has always had a special place in my heart. I have come to realize, though, that I have long exaggerated how good it is because it’s long and it’s a bit all over the place.
But the songs are strong – there isn’t much filler – and it inhabits this weird place in their discography where they seemed to be trying to reconcile to separate sounds that they were about to abandon, the sort of chamber folk rock of Automatic for the People and the artsy, noisy alternative rock of Monster. As such, I think it does a pretty good job of walking somewhere down the middle.
It’s better than Monster, though less interesting, and it has moments that are almost worthy of Automatic for the People.
22. At The Drive-In: Acrobatic Tenement (8/10)
Note: This was apparently released on a tiny label in 1996 but got it’s full release in 1997. It’s here because I try to favour the earliest proper release.
I wonder if post hardcore would have continue to thrive as a kind of music that people perform if At The Drive In had never come along. I don’t doubt that many bands were influenced by Fuguzi (as ATDI were) and the other earlier post hardcore bands but, for some reason, when I hear 21st century post hardcore I often feel like I hear the unmistakable influence of ATDI, rather than any specific earlier band in the genre.
This debut album finds them at what you might call a more “primitive” state, but the things that appeal about them are hear, at least to my ears. It’s a little less ambitious, it’s a little less well-formed, but it’s still great stuff, exactly what you’d want from the genre in my mind – punk songs distorted into songs that are too complicated for punk songs, with healthy dose of hardcore just barely visible.
23. Turbonegro: Ass Cobra (8/10)
For some reason I always thought these guys were going to be Black Metal. I guess I just assumed that because of their name, and because they’re Norwegian. But they’re not Black Metal, obviously.
I think I’d normally be kind of reluctant to get really excited about straight ahead hardcore in 1996 were it not for their demented sense of humour. To put it in perspective, these guys might be the most offensive band not named Anal Cunt. (At least as far as my knowledge of music goes.) “The Midnight NAMBLA” is not only a great pun, but it’s definitely one of the most offensive punk songs I think I’ve ever heard. I mean, if you really wanted to scare your parents, you’d put this song on. (Seriously, parents were scared of Sabbath and bands like that? They should listen to this record, and particularly this song.)
The humour isn’t all pedophilia-related, but it’s just as risque. And even when they’re appearing to play it straight, they probably are not. For me, it’s the humour that elevates this over other decent straight up hardcore records from the ’90s as I’d rather laugh and imagine people getting offended than not.
24. Gastr del Sol: Upgrade & Afterlife (8/10)
There is really nobody else like, droney noise that has bursts of folk in it. What? Read the review of Upgrade & Afterlife.
25. Apocalyptica Plays Metallica by Four Cellos (8?/10)
I love it. Really, I do. Awesome.
26. Jay-Z: Reasonable Doubt (7?/10)
This probably deserves to be much higher on this list. But I only know what I know. Read the review of Reasonable Doubt.
27. Cibo Matto: Viva! La Woman (7/10)
I wish I could get over her accent. Read the review of Viva! La Woman.
28. Sebadoh: Harmacy (7/10)
When I was younger, I certainly preferred my music on the “weirder” side and valued music I thought was unique or innovative or what have you over melody. Maybe I’m changing, because I find myself enjoying Barlow’s songs on this record a lot (lot!) more than on the only other Sebadoh record I know, one recorded 5 years earlier. I think he’s gotten better at writing songs, and I think it doesn’t hurt that he’s decided that they should sound professional. What has happened to me?
But though I find myself quite liking him as a songwriter, and though I enjoy the rather crazy changes of pace and tone brought on by Loewenstein’s songs, I find the entire thing a little much. Like so much indie rock, these guys need someone to tell them when to stop. There’s just too damn much material here and not enough of it is strong. I wish it was 10 minutes shorter, maybe even shorter.
But it’s still a pretty good record with some great songs.
29. Soundgarden: Down on the Upside (7/10)
Unfortunately the songwriting isn’t as strong as the last two. It’s still as clean as the last one, too, which isn’t so good. But it’s still solid stuff. It’s not like they suddenly turned into a post-grunge band or something. It would be really something if the songwriting were as consistent as their last two outings.
I guess that’s as much as I can say.
30. Fugees: The Score (7/10)
Now that I am listening to Hip Hop occasionally as part of our podcast, I sort of figured I would be able to slowly figure out what I think about individual Hip Hop records. But five or more albums in, I still have no idea.
At bottom it is still not something I can really get into.
And so I struggle with a record like this, despite the fact that I have heard their cover of “Killing Me Softly” so many times it strikes me as the definitive version, because of its seemingly outsized reliance on the music of others. Yeah, I know. That’s Hip Hop for you. But it seems like there’s an awful lot of that going on here.
Anyway, I get that this is well done. I understand why it’s good. It just doesn’t do anything for me.
31. Fiona Apple: Tidal (7/10)
In 2012, I wrote the following:
I paid no attention to this when it came out. In fact, I paid little attention to the singles as I barely recognize any of them. Apple was just another in the slew of mid-90s female singer-songwriters who were on the radio. I didn’t care.
Though Apple has certainly matured and improved her aesthetic sense and her reputation as an idiosyncratic singer-songwriter since, there is actually enough of her origins here to really surprise. I feel like she lives up to the standard set by Tori Amos years earlier that so few of these ’90s female singer-songwriters managed to live up to. The album is a little overproduced, and the songs are very much the work of a young person, but putting those things aside this is clearly the birth of a new interesting voice (and an important one, if she were willing to write a few more songs). I’m really surprised at how well this holds up.
I don’t quite agree with that. I think it’s a little more impressive. (She was 17 when she wrote most of these, 17!!!) I don’t think it’s overproduced exactly. Maybe a bit, but not in an offensive way. I still think she’s improved as a songwriter, though.
32. Low: The Curtain Hits the Cast (7/10)
Not knowing Slowcore well enough, this feels like Slowcore brought to its logical conclusion. These songs are slow.
But it’s remarkable how good some of the songs are – I like “The Plan” most – and it’s also impressive that the band can get dynamic tension out such a small sound and such simple music. That’s a miracle, practically.
But that 15 minute song is entirely unnecessary and something I’d skip on any future listens.
33. Modest Mouse: This is a Long Drive for Someone with Nothing to Think About (7/10)
Somewhere between 2008 and 2016, I wrote the following:
I find this record, Modest Mouse’s proper debut (albeit not their first album, really) to be not quite as blatantly demonstrative of their massive Pixies influence as some of their later work in the ’90s (I know, that’s weird). But it’s still a pretty dominant influence.
But as someone else pointed out, there’s also a rather massive Built to Spill influence here. It’s not entirely unfair to say this version of Moddest Mouse sounds like what you would imagine the love child of Black Francis and Doug Martsch to sound like.
Only Brock isn’t the guitarist Martsch is. But he’s a far more emotional singer and a more compelling one and so that helps make up for the lack of guitar wizardry. And it’s hard to get too critical of a band for attempting to sound like the love child of a couple of good bands, instead of trying to sound like their favourite band.
I think Brock’s songs got better later, but there’s a certain freedom and craziness here that’s perhaps absent from later records.
34. Dave Matthews Band: Crash (7/10)
My skepticism has come to an end. Read the review of Crash.
35. Cat Power: What Would the Community Think? (7/10)
This is a solid collection of rootsy indie music. Her songs are strong and the arrangements are idiosyncratic, albeit not anywhere near as idiosyncratic as was becoming common in the indie world.
I have always thought I should get into Cat Power but, though I like this record, I find it kind of innocuous. It’s fine, but I don’t know that my impression will last and, at least at this moment, I cannot see myself rushing back to it any time soon.
36. Bikini Kill: Reject All American (7/10)
In 2016, I wrote
This record starts off as serious Riot Girrrrl – angrier than any I’ve heard before – but then takes a weird detour into Tsunami-style slowcore, albeit played a lot faster… It’s an odd combination that somehow works in spite of the rather radical changes in tone and energy.
The songs aren’t as good as Sleater-Kinney’s, but there’s still a lot to like here.
I don’t completely agree with that in 2021 but close enough.
37. Girls Against Boys: House of GVSB (7/10)
This is the second GVSB record I’ve heard. It strikes me as a little more melodic than their earlier work, though that’s not saying much, given this band. They’ve gone a long way to creating an aesthetic that prides noise and rhythm over melody.
They are a weird band – they certainly have carved out their own niche in the post-hardcore landscape that not a lot of other bands (that I know) have occupied. I think that’s partly because this is territory that not everyone is into.
Anyway, it’s appealing, like their other music. But it lacks really strong songs and is definitely a bit of a case of style over substance.
38. Rage Against the Machine: Evil Empire (7/10)
Unlike earlier “rap metal” fusion bands (who were extremely funk influenced), and unlike future Nu Metal bands (who incorporated a great deal more hip hop-style production), what Rage does is pretty straightforward: hard rock riff plus political rap plus a guitar riff and/or solo that sounds like it might have been created by a turntable. That’s pretty much it. What you think of them likely depends upon whether or not you like those things.
I like riffs, and I like weird guitar noises. I don’t like rap but, when rap is paired with things I like, I can handle it. But this record is pretty one note. They do one thing well, but that’s all they do. And, moreover, it’s kind of repetitive. Part of one riff I recognize from another Rage song (can’t place it), for example.
And everything here just sounds so much like Rage Against the Machine. I mean, that’s good in many ways. They know what they are. But it gets boring after a while.
39. Manic Street Preachers: Everything Must Go (7/10)
In 20212, I wrote the following:
This is my first experience of The Manics, beyond one single (“If You Tolerate This than Your Children Will Be Next,” which I have on a compilation).
As I’ve noted more times than I can count, the problem with hype is that is elevates your expectations to heights where they will never be satisfied.
This is a well made Britpop record with well-above-average lyrics. But one of the best albums of all time? Really? I want my “great” records to do more than just make me happy. For me, greatness is as much measured in influence and staying power (“transcendence” as I like to put it) as how much I actually like the record. This is not a transcendent record by any measure, at least not in North America.
It really is well done, and I like it more than a lot of Britpop, which is not my favourite genre. I can imagine myself coming to like these guys almost as much as Blur if I really gave them the time. But they are not as musically inventive as Blur, even if the lyrics might be on par with Albarn’s (or better).
This record is pretty great Britpop but that’s all it is. And I am utterly mystified as to why there are people in the UK press who think it’s one of the Greatest of All Time. Just mystified.
I actually bumped it down a bit and would say I was perhaps being a tad too kind. The Manics love pairing satirical and critical lyrics with super accessible music and that isn’t my thing, most of the time.
40. Sloan: One Chord to Another (7/10)
Very serviceable power pop. Read the review of One Chord to Another.
41. Bob Mould aka Hubcap (7/10)
This is a reasonably strong set of songs by Mould, occasionally supported by the kind of attitude towards noise that Husker Du used so well at their peak. But the the diversity that made Husker Du great isn’t really present, nor is the contrast between their two songwriters. It’s like listening to half the band, really.
That’s not terrible, but it’s not amazing either. It’s a solid little record, but that’s all.
42. Marilyn Manson: Antichrist Superstar (7/10)
This is surprisingly decent. I can’t say I like his lyrics all that much (they are pretty dumb for such a smart guy) but I find the music to be good enough and far more interesting than I ever would have expected.
Later on my additional comment would be that it’s too long.
43. Nas: It Was Written (7/?/10)
Not sure what to do with it. Read the review of It Was Written.
43. A Tribe Called Quest: Beats, Rhymes and Life (7?/10)
Also don’t know what to do with this. https://rileyhaas.com/2021/07/29/beats-rhymes-and-life-1996-by-a-tribe-called-quest/Read the review of Beats, Rhymes and Life.
45. Big Sugar: Recorded in Hemi-Vision (7/10)
I loved this album when I first heard it sometime in the late ’90s. I was still very much enamoured of blues rock at the time and the dub flirtation was enough to make me think it was really special.
I have vacillated since then: sometimes I think its pretty weak on songs, other times I think that, though its weak on songs, its still quite competent blues rock and the dub fusion thing is relatively unique and well done.
I guess I lean to the latter view today; I don’t know too many other traditional blues rock records that suddenly send you into dub land. And even if there’s a certain unappealing greasiness to Big Sugar (and, absolutely, a lack of really strong songs), I think the attempt at expanding their sound works.
46. The Tea Party: “Alhambra” (7/10)
This really appeals to me.
Not the music, necessarily, though I have a soft spot for the acoustic numbers (and all acoustic versions, in general, probably). The thing that I love is the educational aspect for the computer. It really impressed me that they wanted to teach their audience about their instruments.
Now, maybe this is a little “oh look, we’re so awesome, because we play hurdy gurdys and sitars” but I think it’s good of them. If I were ever in a band, we would play wacky instruments, and we would do this too, only we would use the web, because it exists.
47. Blind Melon: Nico (7*/10)
Pretty decent rarities collection.
48. The Olivia Tremor Control: Music from the Unrealized Film Script Dusk at Cubist Castle (6/10)
This is a rather ridiculous record that asks us to indulge this band’s impulses immediately, before ever listening to them before. This is a debut album and yet it’s a double LP length and it’s full of 10 tracks with the same name and numerous experiments which could have been cut from the finished product
When these guys actually want to write songs, they’re pretty good at it. But there’s just so much damn material here and lots of it isn’t up to the standards of the opening tracks.
And this thing is just so damn worshipful of both ’60s psychedelia and early ’70s McCartney. If you like that stuff, well that’s great. If you don’t, this record is a bit of a slog.
If I have to choose between Neutral Milk Hotel and The Olivia Tremor Control I am going to choose the former every single time.
49. The Cranberries: To the Faithful Departed (6/10)
This is just to middle-of-the-road for me. Read the review of To the Faithful Departed.
50. Sublime (6/10)
Sublime is frat boy rock: just enough musical and lyrical sophistication to appear like it is interesting music, but with enough sex and drugs and reggae to appeal the young man that has not yet turned into a proper adult.
The melodies are strong and the fusion of reggae, hip hop, alternative rock is relatively unique (and is accomplished, absolutely). But the lyrics lose their appeal once you pass 25 or so – or, you know, if you’re a woman – and go through being kind of amusing and seemingly clever to the teenage/early 20s male to problematic for the adult who wants to treat women as human beings.
And the record as a whole just isn’t that consistent. It’s too damn long – two versions of “What I Got”!!! what the fuck?!?! – and there’s not enough strong material in the middle to make it worthwhile. I know like 6 or more of these songs from university, and I still find the rest of the record trying in its length. And I find the other material just lacking enough to remember them. It’s the singles that are the strongest. And given that I don’t like those songs particularly, what does that say about the rest of the record?
I’ll give it a 6, because the musical fusion is definitely their thing, and they’re good at it. But this is music for men who don’t want to grow up.
2021: The thing I’d say is, Nowell has a knack for melody. But a lot of the songs are part covers or interpolations and many of the best musical parts on here are from others. And it’s his lyrics that are the real problem, the older you get the worse they get.
51. Ocean Colour Scene: Moseley Shoals (6/10)
In 2012, I wrote the following:
This is among the most “rock” of all ’90s Brit Pop albums I’ve heard. The band not only appears to really like guitars a lot, but likes lots of rock music, not just the rock music made by British bands between 1962 and 1966. It’s certainly the most rootsy, or the most “classic rock” of the Brit Pop albums I’ve heard.
Maybe that makes it more derivative (particularly of the Stones) than some of the more inventive Brit Bop bands (like Blur) or some of the ones more influenced by Post Punk (like Pulp), but I’d still much rather listen to this than an Oasis record.
In 2021 I find this quite harsh. I don’t know if I’ve mellowed or it’s just the relative familiarity but I think this is a pretty good second wave Brit Pop record that does everything you might want it to while sounding “rock” enough for me most of the time.
Yes, they’re derivative, but they’re good at what they do.
Addendum: On second thought, I’ve both mellowed and gotten used to the songs. It’s a pretty damn derivative record but, like Lenny Kravitz, they have a lot of talent. One thing I wonder about is why would I rate this higher than Lenny Kravitz’s albums? Lack of familiarity?
52. Carcass: Swansong (6/10)
A perfectly fine Death ‘n’ Roll record but I don’t particularly like Death ‘n’ Roll. Read the review of Swansong.
53. Maxwell’s Urban Hang Suite (6/10)
The least neo soul of the first wave of neo soul records. Read the review of Maxwell’s Urban Hang Suite.
54. The Wallflowers: Bringing Down the Horse (6/10)
Like a rootsier Counting Crows. I prefer that. Read the review of Bringing Down the Horse.
55. Counting Crows: Recovering the Satellites (6/10)
56. The Tragically Hip: Trouble at the Henhouse (6/10)
I’m pretty sure this was the Hip’s biggest album. It has a couple of their bigger hits on it – including “Ahead by a Century” which, if not their biggest hit, never seemed to leave Canadian radio in 1996-97.
But I get a strong sense of deja vu from this record, particularly from “Gift Shop” which reminds me of another Hip song so damn much (I just can’t quite place it right now). I like some of their records from the first part of the decade and I’m not sure that this one really improved on any of them. It just feels like another ’90s Hip record, but probably the one that everyone has heard.
I can take it or leave it.
57. Toni Braxton: Secrets (6/10)
Pretty standard ’90s R&B. Read the review of Secrets.
58. George Michael: Older (6/10)
Older and slower and less energetic. Read the review of Older.
59. Patty Loveless: The Trouble with the Truth (6/10)
Contemporary country. It’s fine. Read the review of The Trouble with the Truth.
60. Nirvana: From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah (6/10)
Most – or at least a majority of – live albums are compilations. It used to be fairly rare when an album was just a show – though the most famous, and best, live rock album in history is from one show, but that is the exception not the rule. Far more often they are tour albums. Unless of course we’re talking about Pearl Jam. For tour albums, some engineer (with or without the band) compiles the best versions of each song and edits them together as a performance. It’s often pretty effective.
But when performances are culled from a career, it’s a little more haphazard. And that’s the problem here. There are plenty of fine individual performances, but the album has stuff from practically their entire existence. It makes for some pretty uneven listening, not just in the recording quality but specifically in Cobain’s voice, which changes drastically from song to song. It’s just a little odd and it bugs me.
61. Micheal Hedges: Oracle (6/10)
Michael Hedges is undoubtedly a great guitarist: his technique is incredible and his use of various alternative tunings and approaches to playing is also incredible. Apparently he was also extremely innovative: in the early ’80s he pioneered this style of heavily percussive playing. (There is some controversy over whether he was the first person to play like this, or whether he was he first one to play like this on a steel string acoustic guitar. The latter is likely the more accurate version.) And of course it is a tragedy when anyone, especially a talented musician like this, dies young.
62. 2Pac: All Eyez On Me (5/10)
Some people think this is one of the most overrated hip hop albums ever. I’m inclined to agree. Read the review of All Eyez On Me.
63. The Brian Jonestown Massacre: Their Satanic Majesties’ Second Request (5/10)
Years and years ago, I added this to my list. I don’t remember why. I must have read all the positive reviews. I don’t know.
Years later, I watched an interesting documentary about Brian Jonestown Massacre and The Dandy Warhols where I learned two things: I didn’t like the Dandy Warhols and I had absolutely no interest in learning anything more about Brian Jonestown Massacre.
But I must have forgotten that entirely when I bought this a little while ago. I only remembered it once I started listening.
I figure you can be revivalist in two, not necessarily mutually exclusive ways:
- you can celebrate a genre / scene / style by updating it – by bringing new life to it
- or you can slavishly devote yourself to reproducing that genre. On Their Satanic Majesties’ Second Request, the Brian Jonestown Massacre unsurprisingly, given their name, does the latter.
The results would be great, I guess, if you absolutely love Their Satanic Majesties’ Request or much other, vaguely Indian-influenced psychedelia from that period. If you think that was the weakest Stones album between Aftermath and Exile, or if you are interested in that period of music as a period of music, as opposed to the epitome of music, then I think you are fare less inclined to enjoy this.
The music is fine. It is very competent and it is definitely an authentic reproduction (personally, it rarely feels like an update). The songs are pretty weak, on the whole, but they are psychedelic songs, and psychedelia was never about songwriting.
So the issue is at bottom that the adopted aesthetic overwhelms the musicianship and the creativity feels like it would have been great in 1968 or 1969 but for 1996 I just don’t give a shit. I’m sorry I bought this.
63. The Brian Jonestown Massacre: Take it From the Man! (5/10)
This is the second BJM record I’ve heard and it’s basically just like the other one. All I really hear is the Stones circa 1966-67. (Maybe the odd other influence.) And yes, this is louder, it sounds better, and it’s considerably more “rock” than that music, but I have no idea why a band would devote itself so slavishly to updating a sound from 30 years ago. Also, this record is interminable.
I just don’t get this band – well, I don’t get the critical acclaim this band received – and I doubt I ever will.
PS The theme song from Boardwalk Empire is here, so if you care about such things.
65. Ween: 12 Golden Country Greats (5/10)
This is the first time Ween decided to dedicate themselves to one genre and I guess that was a brave and admirable thing to do, especially given how fully they commit to the traditional country sound.
But the great thing about Ween – and, in particular, the professional version of Ween that emerged in the mid ’90s – is their unparalleled ability to convincingly genre-hop. Ween can sell so many genres on one record but when they try to sell just one, well…
I guess they only thing that would have made this record a classic is really, really great songs. But unfortunately the jokes aren’t consistently funny and whether this is homage or parody disappears to be the point where it actually feels like a sincere attempt to be some kind of trad country comedy band. I prefer the regular Ween that only dabbles in country on occasion.
66. Metallic: Load (4/10)
The most important metal band of the 1980s decides it should make loud classic rock and that you need nearly 80 minutes of it. Read the review of Load.
67. Celine Dion: Falling Into You (4/10)
This absurd album is an absurd hour and 12 minutes long. Read the review of Falling Into You.
Compilations, archival releases and new performances of old music.
Philip Glass: Music in Changing Parts (9/10)
This is as impenetrable as Glass gets, I think. Though Einstein on the Beach is hard to get into if you don’t have the patience, this makes that “opera” downright accessible. Read the rest of the review.
Juilliard Quartet: Intimate Letters (9/10)
Mauricio Kagel et. al: Sankt Bach Passion (7/10)
This is a rather crazy oratorio, based on the idea that Bach was a saint, I guess, and featuring texts drawn from his letters and other sources.
There is a lot going on in this piece and, even after 3 listens, it’s hard to really put into words what I think about it. I do think that, along with Kagel’s other tributes to major composers, it has a lot more to do with Kagel than the object of tribute, in this case Bach. But that doesn’t make it bad.
This is a monumental work which, like so much of Kagel’s work, probably suffers from streaming online through the Toronto library. It deserves serious consideration and I’m not sure I’m quite at a place where I can give it, not just because I haven’t watched it, but because Kagel pulls from so many things (he always does, but here it feels like much more than usual). In some ways I guess this is sort of the Ulysses of oratorios (well, it doesn’t have a reputation like that but it sure is dense).
But whatever we may think of this provocative and long work, it deserves notice.
Various Artists including Oliver Knussen: Horn Concerto, Whitman Settings, Way Castle Yonder, Flourish Fireworks etc by Oliver Knussen (7/10)
An okay survey of some of his orchestral music. Read the Review.
Los Angeles Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Esa-Pekka Salonen: Bernard Herrmann – The Film Scores (7/10)
This is a hilariously named compilation – it implies some level of completeness – but it’s actually an interesting survey, focused almost exclusively on Hitchcock scores. Read the full review.
London Symphony Orchestra, Richard Hickox: Orchestral Works Including Hammersmith and Egdon Heath by Gustav Holst (7/10)
This is a compilation of some of Holst’s shorter orchestral works.